The UN General Assembly Special Session against Corruption (UNGASS) calls for countries to adopt a wide range of measures to recover assets stolen through corruption. This includes non-conviction based forfeiture (NCBF), which is emerging as a powerful tool to recover illicit assets when a criminal conviction is not possible. What can we learn from actual cases of NCBF around the world? What should States consider when introducing NCBF legislation? How can it be applied more effectively and what challenges stand in the way? These questions are the focus of a side event at the 2021 Special Session of the General Assembly against Corruption (UNGASS) on 1 June, co-hosted by our International Centre for Asset Recovery (ICAR) and the Stolen Asset Recovery Initiative (StAR) of the World Bank and UNODC. The event takes place virtually in English on Tuesday, 1 June at 09:00 EST / 15:00 CET and is open to all. Register here: Recovering stolen assets through non-conviction based forfeiture.
Our panel of expert speakers represents both requesting and requested States with experience in applying NCBF to recover stolen assets. Co-moderators:
Panellists:
The UNGASS side event follows our submission to the UNGASS 2021 Consultation Process last year on NCBF and international cooperation, and a speech by panellist Oscar Solórzano at a preparatory meeting on optimising cooperation in asset recovery. In (very) brief, the issue is this: Increasingly, States are turning to NCBF mechanisms as a means to recover the proceeds of corruption and other criminal activity. The United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) recognises NCBF as being a relevant alternative forfeiture mechanism in cases where suspects have died or absconded. States have also successfully used NCBF mechanisms to recover criminal proceeds in other cases where prosecution of an individual may not be possible. This is a positive development in general. However, as NCBF is increasingly adopted by States, it faces new challenges, in particular where evidence or assets are located in States which have not yet adopted such mechanisms. This restricts the ability of States to fulfil their commitment under UNCAC to “_provide the widest measure of mutual legal assistance in investigations, prosecutions and judicial proceedings in relation to offences covered by the Convention_”. The session will explore:
The panellists will discuss cases from different jurisdictions where NCBF procedures have been applied, international assistance has been provided and assets have been returned.